28 May 2019

Learnings from the Oncode Colorectal Cancer workshop

Workshop

Elize Brolsma

To enhance the link between fundamental research and unmet needs in the clinic, Oncode is organizing a series of interactive workshops throughout the year. On Thursday 23 May we kicked off with the first one, focusing on colorectal cancer. Experts on both sides discussed the current clinical practice, unmet medical needs and research with the audience.

Though this is nothing new, the unmet need of selecting the right patient for the right treatment was highlighted at the beginning. Clinician Miriam Koopman (UMC Utrecht) illustrated the importance with a story about the conversations she has with patients. For example, when she explains their treatment option to get a therapy that really only benefits ~20% of the patients. Pieter Tanis, surgeon at the Amsterdam UMC, highlighted surgical challenges such as uncertainties around resection of lymph nodes.

In addition, Miriam introduced the Prospectief Landelijk CRC cohort (PLCRC) as a great resource of tissue, blood and data accessible to researchers in CRC field. She mentioned they want to learn from every patient, not only those in phase III trials. Their ultimate goal is individualized patient care.

Clinician Tineke Buffart (NKI) described how learnings from molecular biology give insights into clinical situations, for example through identification of CRC sub-types. According to her we need to integrate tumor biology in clinical trials.

A number of Oncode Investigators described technologies already available that potentially can help better understand treatment outcomes. One example is a mouse model where researchers observed different response in different areas of the colon, similar to what is observed in some patients.

At the end, Geert Kops, Henk Verheul and Jan Paul Medema emphasized the ways Oncode can support projects addressing unmet clinical needs, for instance via the Clinical Proof of Concept fund and via the Oncode Exploratory Development Expert Support (OEDES) team. Please contact Irene Kanter-Schlifkeif you’d like to receive more information.

The workshop ended with a lively discussion and Jan Paul Medema invited all participants to go home with a next step in mind to further research to impact clinical practice. Think of ideas like: who would you like to meet again to discuss a certain topic or which next experiment will you be doing.

Next workshops

Next workshops are planned in the second half of the year, most likely September and early December. Topics will be breast cancer and glioblastoma, more information will follow.

Other News

Snake venom gland
Venom-producing snake organoids developed in the lab
Researchers from the group of Oncode Investigator Hans Clevers, together with Oncode Investigators Anne Rios, Alexander van Oudenaarden and many others, have developed a method to grow snake venom gland cells as organoids. These lab-grown mini glands produce and secrete active toxins found in snake venom. Snake venom gland organoids can be grown from multiple species and maintained in the lab indefinitely. This new technology holds great promise to reduce the devastating impact and exploit the secrets of snake venom. The results of this research were published in the scientific journal Cell on the 23rd of January.
ElizeBrolsma
Oncode Icons Square 1
EU invests 10 million euro in unlocking technologies for key research in structural biology
To enable researchers from European institutes to extend innovative structural biology research, the EU has invested 10 million euro to iNEXT-Discovery, through its Horizon 2020 program.
Vesnade Jong
20191210 Oncode Investigators Elzo de Wit and Ruben van Boxtel receive ERC Grant Card Image
Oncode Investigators Elzo de Wit and Ruben van Boxtel receive ERC Grant
Oncode Institute is proud to announce that Oncode Investigators Elzo de Wit (Netherlands Cancer Institute) and Ruben van Boxtel (Princess Máxima Center) both receive the ERC Consolidator Grant. The ERC Consolidator Grants are awarded to outstanding researchers with at least seven and up to twelve years of experience after PhD, and a scientific track record showing great promise.
ElizeBrolsma